Re: wal recycling problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Subject Re: wal recycling problem
Date
Msg-id ZRW-7CMzr8HW72ry@elch.exwg.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal recycling problem  (Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: wal recycling problem
List pgsql-hackers
## Fabrice Chapuis (fabrice636861@gmail.com):

> We have a cluster of 2 members (1 primary and 1 standby) with Postgres
> version 14.9 and 2 barman server, slots are only configured for barman,
> barman is version 3.7.

The obvious question here is: can both of those barmans keep up with
your database, or are you seeing WAL retention due to exactly these
replication slots? (Check pg_replication_slots).

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Invalidate the subscription worker in cases where a user loses their superuser status
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed with error - ERROR: column "a" in child table must be marked NOT NULL