Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.
Date
Msg-id ZROspYW0Pe7F9zEL@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 09:39:19AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 9:10 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Err, actually, I am going to disagree here for the patch of HEAD.  It
>> seems to me that there is zero need for pgoutput.h and we don't need
>> to show PGOutputData to the world.  The structure is internal to
>> Pgoutput.c and used only by its internal static routines.
>
> Do you disagree with the approach for the PG16 patch or HEAD? You
> mentioned HEAD but your argument sounds like you disagree with a
> different approach for PG16.

Only HEAD where the structure should be moved from pgoutput.h to
pgoutput.c, IMO.  The proposed patch for PG16 is OK as the size of the
structure should not change in a branch already released.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Move global variables of pgoutput to plugin private scope.
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node