Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes" - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes"
Date
Msg-id ZRMCHUh3S5UJYSpN@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18124: PG16 release note document bug in "Add build option to allow testing of small WAL segment sizes"  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 06:32:48PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:45:04AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 2023-09-21 22:08:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 6:47 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > >> Uh, it is true that we don't have any segment sizes other than WAL, but
> > > >> I am not sure people would easily know that, so I added WAL so people
> > > >> knew.
> > > 
> > > > But the commit in question added a new option that can be used to
> > > > control the relation segment size -- not the WAL segment size.
> > > > Obviously, that's what TAKATSUKA-san meant.
> > > 
> > > Yeah. The release note entry is simply wrong to say it's WAL segment size.
> > 
> > Agreed. Bruce are you committing that bit?
> 
> Yes, I will try to do it tomorrow.

Patch applied.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Only you can decide what is important to you.



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's processes blocking each other are not detected as deadlock
Next
From: Kyle MacMillan
Date:
Subject: md5 password valid and invalid after upgrading