Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run
Date
Msg-id ZQACnWUtc/Y9pFES@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run  (Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Make psql's qeury canceling test simple by using signal() routine of IPC::Run
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 12:45:24AM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
> I attached the update patch. I removed the incorrect comments and
> unnecessary lines. Also,  I rewrote the test to use "skip_all" instead
> of SKIP because we skip the whole test rather than a part of it.

Thanks for checking how IPC::Run behaves in this case on Windows!

Right.  This test is currently setting up a node for nothing, so let's
skip this test entirely under $windows_os and move on.  I'll backpatch
that down to 15 once the embargo on REL_16_STABLE is lifted with the
16.0 tag.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind with cascade standby doesn't work well
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Row pattern recognition