Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Date
Msg-id ZPIrISXQz1FOsh6/@pryzbyj2023
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 11:08:51AM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > This should probably give a distinct error when syncfs is not supported
> > than when it's truely recognized.
> 
> Later versions of the patch should have this.

Oops, right.

> > The patch should handle pg_dumpall, too.
> 
> It looks like pg_dumpall only ever fsyncs a single file, so I don't think
> it is really needed there.

What about (per git grep no-sync doc) pg_receivewal?

-- 
Justin

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?