Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id ZN6t2cfi21+YFoet@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Normalization of utility queries in pg_stat_statements  (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 05:11:47PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> SELECT calls, toplevel, rows, query FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY
> query COLLATE "C";
> returns:
>  calls | toplevel | rows |               query
> -------+----------+------+------------------------------------
>      1 | t        |    0 | CALL ptest3($1)
>      2 | f        |    2 | INSERT INTO cp_test VALUES ($2, x)
>      1 | t        |    1 | SELECT pg_stat_statements_reset()
>
> here, the intermediate CALL part is optimized away. or should I expect
> CALL ptest1($1) also in pg_stat_statements?

I would have guessed that ptest1() being called as part of ptest3()
should show up in the report if you use track = all, as all the nested
queries of a function, even if it is pure SQL, ought to show up.  Now
note that ptest1() not showing up is not a new behavior, ~15 does the
same thing by missing it.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Use of additional index columns in rows filtering
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging of matching pg_hba.conf entry during auth skips trust auth, potential security issue