On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 01:28:24PM +0300, Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> Justin Pryzby писал 2023-03-26 17:51:
> > On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 01:09:35PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > This currently handles partitions with a loop around the whole CIC
> > > implementation, which means that things like WaitForLockers() happen
> > > once for each index, the same as REINDEX CONCURRENTLY on a partitioned
> > > table. Contrast that with ReindexRelationConcurrently(), which handles
> > > all the indexes on a table in one pass by looping around indexes within
> > > each phase.
> >
> > Rebased over the progress reporting fix (27f5c712b).
> >
> > I added a list of (intermediate) partitioned tables, rather than looping
> > over the list of inheritors again, to save calling rel_get_relkind().
> >
> > I think this patch is done.
>
> Overall looks good to me. However, I think that using 'partitioned' as list
> of partitioned index oids in DefineIndex() is a bit misleading - we've just
> used it as boolean, specifying if we are dealing with a partitioned
> relation.
Right. This is also rebased on 8c852ba9a4 (Allow some exclusion
constraints on partitions).
--
Justin
