Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation
Date
Msg-id ZJOJtk18kNQOnllW@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ProcessStartupPacket(): database_name and user_name truncation
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 12:55:15PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> LGTM.  I think this can wait for v17 since the current behavior has been
> around since 2001 and AFAIK this is the first report.  While it's arguably
> a bug fix, the patch also breaks some cases that work today.

Agreed that anything discussed on this thread does not warrant a
backpatch.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does pg_bsd_indent need to be installed?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove deprecation warnings when compiling PG ~13 with OpenSSL 3.0~