On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 02:01:47PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> That makes sense, even though it's a bit duplicative as it stands in core
> today. Given that these *can* be different at some point in the future (or in
> a fork), we should check both of course.
Yes, who knows what the future is made of.
> Attached v5 does that as well as incorporates a version of the doc
> change proposed in v4 upthread.
Looks rather OK on a quick pass.
--
Michael
