Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Date
Msg-id ZDNQivfVFEjBGAjg@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 09:50:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think that's largely independent.  We don't look back at closed-out CFs
> as a kind of TODO list; anything that's left behind there is basically
> never going to be seen again, until the author makes a new CF entry.
>
> Anything that's to be treated as an open item for v16 should get added
> to the wiki page at
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_16_Open_Items
>
> It's not necessary that a patch exist to do that.

And patches that are marked as bug fixes in the CF app had better not
be lost in the long run, even if they are not listed as an open item
as a live issue.  Sometimes people apply "Bug Fix" as a category which
would imply a backpatch in most cases, and looking at the patch proves
that this can be wrong.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Show various offset arrays for heap WAL records