Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
Date
Msg-id ZDCvttL99nxgGkiw@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Is RecoveryConflictInterrupt() entirely safe in a signal handler?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 01:32:22AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I'm hoping to get just the regex changes in ASAP, and then take a
> little bit longer on the recovery conflict patch itself (v6-0005) on
> the basis that it's bugfix work and not subject to the feature freeze.

Agreed.  It would be good to check with the RMT, but as long as that's
not at the middle/end of the beta cycle I guess that's OK for this
one, even if it is only for HEAD.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Track IO times in pg_stat_io