Re: zstd compression for pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Subject | Re: zstd compression for pg_dump |
Date | |
Msg-id | ZCdpzywVGl0BLan2@telsasoft.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: zstd compression for pg_dump (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: zstd compression for pg_dump
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 06:23:26PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 3/27/23 19:28, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 03:43:31AM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > >> On 3/16/23 05:50, Justin Pryzby wrote: > >>> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 12:48:13PM -0800, Jacob Champion wrote: > >>>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 10:59 AM Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com> wrote: > >>>>> I did some smoke testing against zstd's GitHub release on Windows. To > >>>>> build against it, I had to construct an import library, and put that > >>>>> and the DLL into the `lib` folder expected by the MSVC scripts... > >>>>> which makes me wonder if I've chosen a harder way than necessary? > >>>> > >>>> It looks like pg_dump's meson.build is missing dependencies on zstd > >>>> (meson couldn't find the headers in the subproject without them). > >>> > >>> I saw that this was added for LZ4, but I hadn't added it for zstd since > >>> I didn't run into an issue without it. Could you check that what I've > >>> added works for your case ? > >>> > >>>>> Parallel zstd dumps seem to work as expected, in that the resulting > >>>>> pg_restore output is identical to uncompressed dumps and nothing > >>>>> explodes. I haven't inspected the threading implementation for safety > >>>>> yet, as you mentioned. > >>>> > >>>> Hm. Best I can tell, the CloneArchive() machinery is supposed to be > >>>> handling safety for this, by isolating each thread's state. I don't feel > >>>> comfortable pronouncing this new addition safe or not, because I'm not > >>>> sure I understand what the comments in the format-specific _Clone() > >>>> callbacks are saying yet. > >>> > >>> My line of reasoning for unix is that pg_dump forks before any calls to > >>> zstd. Nothing zstd does ought to affect the pg_dump layer. But that > >>> doesn't apply to pg_dump under windows. This is an opened question. If > >>> there's no solid answer, I could disable/ignore the option (maybe only > >>> under windows). > >> > >> I may be missing something, but why would the patch affect this? Why > >> would it even affect safety of the parallel dump? And I don't see any > >> changes to the clone stuff ... > > > > zstd supports using threads during compression, with -Z zstd:workers=N. > > When unix forks, the child processes can't do anything to mess up the > > state of the parent processes. > > > > But windows pg_dump uses threads instead of forking, so it seems > > possible that the pg_dump -j threads that then spawn zstd threads could > > "leak threads" and break the main thread. I suspect there's no issue, > > but we still ought to verify that before declaring it safe. > > OK. I don't have access to a Windows machine so I can't test that. Is it > possible to disable the zstd threading, until we figure this out? I think that's what's best. I made it issue a warning if "workers" was specified. It could also be an error, or just ignored. I considered disabling workers only for windows, but realized that I haven't tested with threads myself - my local zstd package is compiled without threading, and I remember having some issue recompiling it with threading. Jacob's recipe for using meson wraps works well, but it still seems better to leave it as a future feature. I used that recipe to enabled zstd with threading on CI (except for linux/autoconf). > >>> The function is first checking if it was passed a filename which already > >>> has a suffix. And if not, it searches through a list of suffixes, > >>> testing for an existing file with each suffix. The search with stat() > >>> doesn't happen if it has a suffix. I'm having trouble seeing how the > >>> hasSuffix() branch isn't dead code. Another opened question. > >> > >> AFAICS it's done this way because of this comment in pg_backup_directory > >> > >> * ... > >> * ".gz" suffix is added to the filenames. The TOC files are never > >> * compressed by pg_dump, however they are accepted with the .gz suffix > >> * too, in case the user has manually compressed them with 'gzip'. > >> > >> I haven't tried, but I believe that if you manually compress the > >> directory, it may hit this branch. > > > > That would make sense, but when I tried, it didn't work like that. > > The filenames were all uncompressed names. Maybe it worked differently > > in an older release. Or maybe it changed during development of the > > parallel-directory-dump patch and it's actually dead code. > > Interesting. Would be good to find out. I wonder if a little bit of > git-log digging could tell us more. Anyway, until we confirm it's dead > code, we should probably do what .gz does and have the same check for > .lz4 and .zst files. I found that hasSuffix() and cfopen() originated in the refactored patch Heikki's sent here; there's no history beyond that. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4D3954C7.9060503%40enterprisedb.com The patch published there appends the .gz within cfopen(), and the caller writes into the TOC the filename without ".gz". It seems like maybe a few hours prior, Heikki may have been appending the ".gz" suffix in the caller, and then writing the TOC with filename.gz. The only way I've been able to get a "filename.gz" passed to hasSuffix is to write a directory-format dump, with LOs, and without compression, and then compress the blobs with "gzip", and *also* edit the blobs.toc file to say ".gz" (which isn't necessary since, if the original file isn't found, the restore would search for files with compressed suffixes). So .. it's not *technically* unreachable, but I can't see why it'd be useful to support editing the *content* of the blob TOC (other than compressing it). I might give some weight to the idea if it were also possible to edit the non-blob TOC; but, it's a binary file, so no. For now, I made the change to make zstd and lz4 to behave the same here as .gz, unless Heikki has a memory or a git reflog going back far enough to further support the idea that the code path isn't useful. I'm going to set the patch as RFC as a hint to anyone who would want to make a final review. -- Justin
Attachment
pgsql-hackers by date: