Re: cursor use vs pg_stat_statements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: cursor use vs pg_stat_statements
Date
Msg-id ZC9Ip7b9VlbgSuY3@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: cursor use vs pg_stat_statements  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 09:53:38AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Try again with autocommit turned off. Sorry, I omitted that crucial
> detail. Exact test code attached (name/password removed)

For the same of the archives, this should be OK now under 1d477a9.
See also this thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/EBE6C507-9EB6-4142-9E4D-38B1673363A7@amazon.com
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yurii Rashkovskii
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Next
From: reid.thompson@crunchydata.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Add the ability to limit the amount of memory that can be allocated to backends.