On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:17PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> A minor comment for the README is that now we have five support
> functions not four.
>
> - outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all four support
> + outcome. (For some classes of node types, you don't need all five support
Right, missed that. How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
and make that simpler? I would propose:
"For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
functions."
--
Michael