Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
Date
Msg-id ZAhpGfbFgvX9SEMX@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add pg_walinspect function with block info columns
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:01:56PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> I understand that performance is critical here but we need to ensure
> memory is used wisely. Therefore, I'd still vote to free at least the
> major contributors here, that is, pfree(raw_data);, pfree(raw_page);
> and pfree(flags); right after they are done using. I'm sure pfree()s
> don't hurt more than resetting memory context for every block_id.

Okay by me to have intermediate pfrees between each block scanned if
you feel strongly about it.

> I think we need to output block data length (blk->data_len) similar to
> fpilen to save users from figuring out how to get the length of a
> bytea column. This will also keep block data in sync with FPI info.

length() works fine on bytea, so it can be used on the block data.
fpilen is a very different matter as it would be the length of a page
without a hole, or just something compressed.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow tailoring of ICU locales with custom rules
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: Rework LogicalOutputPluginWriterUpdateProgress