Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Date
Msg-id Z9Ip6YbTU3MEFBXP@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string  (Ryo Kanbayashi <kanbayashi.dev@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 08:53:49AM +0900, Ryo Kanbayashi wrote:
> If you can't work for ther patch for a while because you are busy or
> other some reason,
> I can become additinal reviewer and  apply review comments from Micael
> to the patch  instead of you.
>
> If you don't want my action, please reply and notice me that. If
> possible, within a week :)

Putting a bit of context here.  Most of the Postgres hackers based in
Japan had a meeting last Friday, and Kanbayashi-san has asked me about
patches that introduce to simpler code paths in the tree that could be
worked on for this release.  I've mentioned this thread to him.

> Just to let you know, my action is not intended to steal your
> contribution but to prevent your good idea from being lost.

Authors and reviewers get busy because of life and work matters, and
contributions are listed in the commit logs for everybody who
participates.  If you can help move this patch forward, thanks a lot
for the help!  IMO, that would be great.  The patch set still needs
more reorganization and adjustments, but I think that we can get it
there.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Dubious server log messages after pg_upgrade
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_rewind with --write-recovery-conf option doesn't write dbname to primary_conninfo value.