On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 11:32:28AM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> Is it possible that the signal number we're getting called for is above
> PG_NSIG? That'd explain why the source value is something fairly random?
>
> ISTM that we should add an Assert() to wrapper_handler() that ensures that the
> signal arg is below PG_NSIG.
We have such an assertion in pqsignal() before we install wrapper_handler
for anything. Is there another way it could be getting called with a
different signo?
--
nathan
