Re: doc: expand note about pg_upgrade's --jobs option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: doc: expand note about pg_upgrade's --jobs option
Date
Msg-id Z8hvP82sKppwRmVu@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: doc: expand note about pg_upgrade's --jobs option  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: doc: expand note about pg_upgrade's --jobs option
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 01:52:40PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Another option that I think would also work is to just cut down the details
> to just "The <option>--jobs</option> option allows multiple CPU cores to be
> used".

That's fine with me.  It's probably not particularly actionable
information, anyway.  If anything, IMHO we should make it clear to users
that the parallelization is per-database (except for file transfer, which
is per-tablespace).  If you've just got one big database in the default
tablespace, --jobs won't help.

> I think this is also slightly confusing, but maybe that's a
> non-native-english thing: "a good place to start is the maximum of the
> number of  CPU cores and tablespaces.". Am I supposed to set it to
> max(cpucores, ntablespaces) or to max(cpucores+ntablespaces)?

I've always read it to mean the former.  But I'm not sure that's great
advice.  If you have 8 cores and 100 tablespaces, does it make sense to use
--jobs=100?  Ordinarily, I'd suggest the number of cores as the starting
point.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow database owners to CREATE EVENT TRIGGER
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrade FreeBSD CI images to 14.2