Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bertrand Drouvot
Subject Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Date
Msg-id Z8CH9SVZLv2j/lwF@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability  (Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 3:06 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > Why is this done before we even have gotten -2 back? Even if we need it, it
> > seems like we ought to defer this until necessary.
> 
> Not fixed yet: maybe we could even do a `static` with
> `has_this_run_earlier` and just perform this work only once during the
> first time?

Not sure I get your idea, could you share what the code would look like?

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal - plpgsql - support standard syntax for named arguments for cursors
Next
From: Alexandra Wang
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support