Hi,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 02:37:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 09:24:41AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > That's right but that would mean almost duplicating the pg_stat_wal related
> > stuff (because it can't be removed from the doc until the fields are gone). I
> > think it's simpler to do it as proposed initially (the end result is the same).
>
> After sleeping on it, I still saw no reason to not apply the changes
> from 0002 in wal.sgml to describe that the stats for the writes/fsyncs
> are in pg_stat_io rather than pg_stat_wal for the "WAL configuration"
> section, so done that.
I see, I did not get that you wanted to get rid of the pg_stat_wal part before
removing the fields. Makes sense that way to "just" replace the pg_stat_wal
by pg_stat_io first in the doc as you've done in 4538bd3f1dd.
> and I've moved that as a paragraph not under the tuning part, to make
> it a more general statement with its link to "WAL configuration",
> which is a very popular link for pg_stat_io.
Makes more sense, agree.
> Attached is the rest, as of v3-0002.
LGTM.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
