Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Julien Rouhaud
Subject Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
Date
Msg-id Z7UwEEbiuV0m6PJR@jrouhaud
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
List pgsql-www
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 07:51:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes:
> >> The spam filtering[1] that occurs for the header information appears to
> >> have been applied to the bottom link as well - making it 404. Not sure
> >> where that is getting applied, but doing a "raw source" and checking my
> >> original inbox seems to indicate the link at the bottom of the email was
> >> sent unobscured.
>
> > FWIW I confirm that I did send a valid / unobscured link.
>
> IME the trick to keeping this from happening is to manually convert
> any "@" characters in the URL you send to "%40".  Usually if you
> copy-and-paste from your browser address bar that happens for free.

That's what I usually do.  I guess that time I just copied the link from some
email header.



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: Overeager spam fighting for link?