On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 02:09:09PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-08-01 at 13:24 +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> > > I think this is a documentation issue, specifically that Section 8.5.3
> > > is not sufficiently in-your-face about "UTC+2" not meaning what you
> > > probably think. We didn't really do anybody any favors by shoving
> > > those details off to Appendix B.
> >
> > IMO the warning should be placed closer to the documentation for AT
> > TIME ZONE where users have more chances to find it. Here is the patch.
>
> I think it is odd to have a second set of examples in the documentation
> of AT TIME ZONE. My attached patch instead adds an example with
> explanation to the already existing examples and a nore to the data
> types section.
>
> What do you think?
Thanks, patch applied to master.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
