Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
Date
Msg-id Z3Qg5bDU3NnYW7AW@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
Responses Re: Backport of CVE-2024-10978 fix to older pgsql versions (11, 9.6, and 9.4)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 10:50:10AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > Maybe, if we were doing an only-critical-fixes LTS release series,
> > it'd be easier for downstream outfits to consume that instead of
> > cherry-picking security fixes.  I'm just speculating though.
> > It's entirely possible that packagers would ignore our opinions
> > and keep on cherry-picking only security fixes, in which case
> > we'd be doing a lot of work for little return.
> 
> ... if there were a PostgreSQL LTS series, Debian would probably use it.
> 
> Overall, I think the current 5-year support window is good enough.
> I don't see PostgreSQL supporting 10 years, so ELTS efforts will
> always have to do some patching on their own.

Thanks, that was very helpful.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: Modern SHA2- based password hashes for pgcrypto
Next
From: Shayon Mukherjee
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)