On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 04:12:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> If we are leaning towards a more comprehensive fix in v18, ISTM we should
>> go ahead and revert commit 562bee0 (both for master and v17). Or am I
>> misinterpreting the proposed path forward here?
>
> That seems like a reasonable thing to do now, since we have a
> complaint about v17's behavior and there seems no compelling
> reason why v17 has to address this ancient issue.
Done. Thanks all for the discussion.
--
nathan
