Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Date
Msg-id Z0dNyskuXOCM-dOz@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 04:36:07PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> I'd vote for "leave it alone" or wait to see if we get more reports before
> deciding.

Did your initial report originate from users or from just exploring the
code?  If it's the latter, then AFAICT this thread is really the only
feedback from the field we have to go on, and IMHO it'd be better to
proceed with reverting.  But if you were fielding complaints from users,
then perhaps there is more room for discussion.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails