On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:54:22PM -0500, kovert@omniscient.com wrote:
> I wanted to follow up on the decision to blow off Apple's built-in
> GSSAPI. Years back, for reasons I never found, Apple switched from MIT
> to Heimdal and have been maintaining their own version of it. I'm not
> clear how well they maintain it but they have enhanced it.
Apple switched because Apple hired then developers of Heimdal, and they
liked it better than MIT Kerberos. I have worked on both and know them
intimately well and I too prefer Heimdal, mainly because it has a very
nice ASN.1 compiler.
Apple does enhance their fork of Heimdal, and they publish their changes
with Darwin drops. But they do not contribute back to Heimdal.
> One of the things that Apple put it in was a different centralized
> credentials cache system. (named of the form "API:uuid"). This isn't
> in Heimdal nor is it in MIT, so typical kerberos tickets issued by the
Well, MIT and Heimdal support the KCM: cache type, which is an IPC
interface to the system credentials cache daemon, which is basically
what the API: cache type is, and they both support the CCAPI anyways,
which is also what the API: cache really is (basically it's a shared
object exporting an API for credentials caches). So they can both use
the OS X API: cache. Well, I think so -- I don't use OS X so I don't
know how well the OS X API: cache works with Heimdal or MIT Kerberos,
but I believe it should.
Nico
--
