Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Date
Msg-id Z-X-5PuSn98H6eJl@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:31:14PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> With all that in mind and more documentation added to the test, I've
> applied 0001, so let's see what the buildfarm has to say.  The CI was
> stable, so it's a start.

The buildfarm (particularly the Windows members that worried me), have
reported back and I am not seeing any failures, so we should be good
with 72c2f36d5727.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rafael Thofehrn Castro
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Progressive explain
Next
From: "Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
Date:
Subject: RE: Partial aggregates pushdown