On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 05:47:11PM -0700, jadel@mercury.com wrote:
> From: Jade Lovelace <jadel@mercury.com>
>
> I have intentionally been careful to not guarantee that the
> automatically generated name *is* what's documented, but instead give
> the general idea.
>
> Knowing the format is useful for people writing migrations/ORM tools
> which need to name their unique indices and may wish to use the
> automatic naming system.
Uh, I always that if people didn't want to specify an index name, that
they didn't care. I think there are enough concurrency issues listed
below that I don't see the value of documenting this. If they really
care, they can look at the source code.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
