On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 08:57:04AM -0400, Isaac Morland wrote:
> I was going to point out that pg_database_owner is the same way, but it is
> fundamentally different in that it has no special allowed access and is
> meant to be the target of permission grants rather than being granted to
> other roles.
>
> +1 to rename it to pg_checkpoint or to some similar name.
We are still in beta, so, FWIW, I am fine to adjust this name even if
it means an extra catversion bump.
"checkpoint" is not a verb (right?), so would something like
"pg_perform_checkpoint" rather than "pg_checkpoint" fit better in the
larger picture?
--
Michael
