On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 06:13:28PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Or maybe we could mention that but use a wording that doesn't make it
> sound like an implementation detail, like:
>
> +Previously, an ordered partition scan could not be used for a
> LIST-partitioned table with any partition containing multiple values,
> nor for partitioned tables with DEFAULT partition. Now it can be used
> in those cases at least for queries in which such partitions are
> pruned.
Sorry, I just don't see this as an improvement because it starts with a
complex term "an ordered partition scan" rather than simply "a
partitioned table".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
