Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas
Date
Msg-id Yl3EUNGA+ve1IRZ4@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Apr  7, 2022 at 03:11:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 2:43 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> > But if we were in a green-field situation we'd probably not want to
> > use up several bytes for a nonse anyway. You said so yourself.
> 
> I don't know what statement of mine you're talking about here, and
> while I don't love using up space for a nonce, it seems to be the way
> this encryption stuff works. I don't see that there's a reasonable
> alternative, green field or no.

Uh, XTS doesn't require a nonce, so why are talking about nonces in this
thread?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Indecision is a decision.  Inaction is an action.  Mark Batterson

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Dump/Restore of non-default PKs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot()", File: "toast_internals.c", Line: 670, PID: 19403)