On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 01:14:02PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 10:16:34AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> Yeah, I thought about it but didn't rename it given your concerns about git
>> history. I'm fine either way.
>
> Oh, OK. The amount of diffs created by 0001 is still fine to grab
> even with the struct rename, so let's stick with it.
And so, this first part has been applied as of d4781d8. I'll try to
look at 0002 shortly.
--
Michael