On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:28:53AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>
> My understanding of "Returned with Feedback" is that the patch implements
> something wanted, but as proposed won't be accepted without a major redesign or
> something like that. Not patches that are going through normal "review /
> addressing reviews" cycles. And definitely not bug fixes either.
>
> If we close all patches that had a review just because they weren't perfect in
> their initial submission, we're just going to force everyone to re-register
> their patch for every single commit fest. I don't see that doing anything
> apart from making sure that everyone stops contributing.
>
I had the same problem last time, "Returned with feedback" didn't feel
fine in some cases.
After reading this i started to wish there was some kind of guide about
this, and of course the wiki has that guide (outdated yes but something
to start with).
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_Checklist#Sudden_Death_Overtime
This needs some love, still mentions rrreviewers for example, but if we
updated and put here a clear definition of the states maybe it could
help to do CF managment.
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL
