Re: Split xlog.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Split xlog.c
Date
Msg-id YfI9DeuuqkNi+AT4@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Split xlog.c  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Responses Re: Split xlog.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:12:40PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> In last round of review, I spotted one bug: I had mixed up the meaning of
> EndOfLogTLI. It is the TLI in the *filename* of the WAL segment that we read
> the last record from, which can be different from the TLI that the last
> record is actually on. All existing tests were passing with that bug, so I
> added a test case to cover that case.

FYI, this overlaps with a different patch sent recently, as of this
thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAJ_b94Vjt5cXGza_1MkjLQWciNdEemsmiWuQj0d=M7JfjAa1g@mail.gmail.com
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP test to cover "EndOfLogTLI != replayTLI" case
Next
From: Greg Nancarrow
Date:
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication