Tom Lane wrote:
[dd]
> The specific point that depesz was responding to in that blog
> was the 64K-ish limit on rangetable entries in a query. That is
> a thing, as he could have shown by using queries that weren't
> amenable to plan-time pruning. (It's also an ex-thing, having
> been fixed for v15 [1]; but that doesn't help you today.)
> Now, if you use no queries that can't be pruned to a few
> partitions, then it's academic for you.
The table will be partitioned `BY LIST (customer_id)` which is a unique
index. All queries will be using this index so no query should ever
have to use more than 1 partition.
This means basically I'm OK?
--
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49@fidonet
