On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 08:29:54AM +0200, Ronan Dunklau wrote:
> Ok, do you want me to propose a different patch for previous versions ?
That's not necessary. Thanks for proposing.
> Do you mean restart_lsn as the pointer argument to the function, or
> restart_lsn as the field returned by the command ? If it's the first, I'll
> change it but if it's the latter it is expected that we sometime run this on a
> slot where WAL has never been reserved yet.
restart_lsn as the pointer of the function.
--
Michael
