Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests
Date
Msg-id YWTw7/oK9TXjZrV0@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: More business with $Test::Builder::Level in the TAP tests  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:48:54AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> I would say:
>
>     This should be incremented by any subroutine which directly or
>     indirectly calls test routines from Test::More, such as ok() or
>     is().

Indeed, that looks better.  I have just used that and applied the
change down to 12 where we have begun playing with level
incrementations.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations