On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:17:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Using READ_REPLICATION_SLOT as the command name is fine, and it could
> be extended with more fields if necessary, implemented now with only
> what we think is useful. Returning errors on cases that are still not
> supported yet is fine, say for logical slots if we decide to reject
> the case for now, and testrictions can always be lifted in the
> future.
And marked as RwF as this was three weeks ago. Please feel free to
register a new entry if this is being worked on.
--
Michael
