Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date
Msg-id YVawcJVd0M2wg8Hi@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 03:08:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On top of the tests for needed for custom GUCs, this needs tests for
> the new int64 reloption.  I would suggest to add something in
> dummy_index_am, where we test all the reloption APIs.

My review here was three weeks ago, and there has been no replies from
the author, so I am marking this patch set as RwF.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum (analyze) on partitioned tables for ATTACH/DETACH/DROP commands
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend