Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date
Msg-id YS9GNj2yK9Yd3nYz@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Tom Lane
> I did not like confusing the RISC-V case with the ARM case: duplicating
> the code block seems better, in case there's ever reason to add
> arch-specific stuff like SPIN_DELAY.  So I split it off to its own
> code block and pushed it.

Fwiw I can report success on Debian's riscv port with that commit
cherry-picked onto 13.4:

https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=postgresql-13&arch=riscv64&ver=13.4-3&stamp=1630411643&raw=0

Christoph



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: shouldn't timezone(text, timestamp[tz]) be STABLE?
Next
From: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Parallel Inserts (WAS: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks..)