Re: Different compression methods for FPI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Different compression methods for FPI
Date
Msg-id YNE5KN8vzUH7eMqj@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Different compression methods for FPI  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 07:19:27PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> The two similar, existing messages are:
>
> +#define NO_LZ4_SUPPORT() \
> +       ereport(ERROR, \
> +                       (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED), \
> +                        errmsg("unsupported LZ4 compression method"), \
> +                        errdetail("This functionality requires the server to be built with lz4 support."), \
> +                        errhint("You need to rebuild PostgreSQL using --with-lz4.")))
>
> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c:                           fatal("cannot restore from compressed archive
(compressionnot supported in this installation)"); 
> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c:           pg_log_warning("archive is compressed, but this installation does not
supportcompression -- no data will be available"); 
> src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c:              pg_log_warning("requested compression not available in this installation --
archivewill be uncompressed"); 

The difference between the first message and the rest is that the
backend has much more room in terms of error verbosity while
xlogreader.c needs to worry also about the frontend.  In this case, we
need to worry about the block involved and its LSN.  Perhaps you have
a suggestion?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Optionally automatically disable logical replication subscriptions on error
Next
From: Ajin Cherian
Date:
Subject: Re: Added schema level support for publication.