On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 03:04:53PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Thanks, that looks promising. I repeated the tests I did on 26/4, and the
> results look like this:
>
> old (0c7d3bb99): 497ms
> master: 621ms
> patched: 531ms
>
> So yeah, that's a bit improvement - it does not remove the regression
> entirely, but +5% is much better than +25%.
Hmm. Is that really something we should do after feature freeze? A
25% degradation for matview refresh may be a problem for a lot of
users and could be an upgrade stopper. Another thing we could do is
also to revert 7db0cd2 and 39b66a9 from the v14 tree, and work on a
proper solution for this performance problem for matviews for 15~.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
