Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Victor Sudakov
Subject Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Date
Msg-id YCJtCOi+M7F1aN04@admin.sibptus.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
List pgsql-admin
Andrey Borodin wrote:
> 
> 
> > 9 февр. 2021 г., в 15:12, Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> написал(а):
> > 
> > I'm considering WAL-G now, not as a backup solution per se, but as an
> > advanced WAL archiver which can:
> Keep in mind that once upon a time you will have to delete WAL segments. If you just use wal-g delete you have to
pointour which backup to keep.
 

Thank you, this is an important note.

> 
> > 1. Upload/download WALs directly to S3
> > 
> > 2. Verify WALs integrity (a very nice feature, but I think does not work
> > if there are no backups)
> If will not be alarmed if WALs before backup are missing. Though it should still analyze chains correctly.
> 
> > 3. Prevent WAL overwrite (does it work?)
> I think so.
> 

OK.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/



pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability