Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
Date
Msg-id YB3uZ4RKXX12uD1n@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:01:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> But given that, I'm content to say "you can use ReFS if you have
> a version that supports hard links".  We don't need to support
> work-in-progress filesystems.

Yeah, agreed.  I think that it could be interesting to get a buildfarm
animal in place that supports such a configuration if users care about
that?  If not, we are going to have a hard time tracking down issues
in the WIN32 port.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #16854: initdb fails on ReFS and FAT32 file systems
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16856: Crash when add "_RETURN" rule on child table