On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:37:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I guess you could make the case that the CCI call should be in the
> callers where we actually loop (SetDefaultACLsInSchemas,
> RemoveRoleFromObjectACL), but it's hard to get excited about the added
> clutter.
Yeah, that matches my thoughts. And I did not see any harm in putting
the CCI in SetDefaultACL() even for the case of pg_default_acl with
DROP OWNED BY. So applied and backpatched. Thanks, Alvaro and
Andrus.
--
Michael
