Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables
Date
Msg-id Y8g2QCvKq3i2IRDi@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: document the need to analyze partitioned tables  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:49:19AM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:15:18AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 16:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:00:50PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > > Maybe (all?) the clarification the docs need is to say:
> > > > "Partitioned tables are not *themselves* processed by autovacuum."
> > > 
> > > Yes, I think the lack of autovacuum needs to be specifically mentioned
> > > since most people assume autovacuum handles _all_ statistics updating.
> 
> That's what 61fa6ca79 aimed to do.  Laurenz is suggesting further
> clarification.

Ah, makes sense, thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

Embrace your flaws.  They make you human, rather than perfect,
which you will never be.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Implement missing join selectivity estimation for range types
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Const'ify the arguments of ilist.c/ilist.h functions