Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths
Date
Msg-id Y4mLrwaDrUEp47Ms@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths  (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Non-replayable WAL records through overflows and >MaxAllocSize lengths  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 09:52:39AM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> CommitFest 2022-11 is currently underway, so if you are interested
> in moving this patch forward, now would be a good time to update it.

No replies after 4 weeks, so I have marked this entry as returned
with feedback.  I am still wondering what would be the best thing to
do here..
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert