On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:00:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Oh, okay. That's an argument in favor of not doing that, then.
> Perhaps we'd better revisit the introduction of tls-exporter once we
> know more about all that, and it looks like we would need a way to be
> able to negotiate which channel binding to use (I recall that the
> surrounding RFCs allowed some extra negotiation, vaguely, but my
> impression may be wrong).
I am not sure what can be done for that now, so I have marked the
patch as returned with feedback.
--
Michael
