Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db
Date
Msg-id Y3wbe2dnxh9B4fLF@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db  (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ps command does not show walsender's connected db
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:32:11PM +0900, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> Fujii-san is marked as committer on the commifest entry for this patch [1];
> are you able to go ahead and get it committed?

That's the state of the patch since the 11th of October.  Seeing the
lack of activity, I propose to take care of that myself if there are
no objections, only on HEAD.  That could be qualified as a bug, but
that does not seem worth bothering the back-branches, either.  Except
if somebody has a different opinion?

The patch looks to do the job correctly, still I would leave the extra
printf() calls in BackendStartup() out.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
Next
From: "Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp"
Date:
Subject: RE: Partial aggregates pushdown