Re: pg_checksum: add test for coverage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: pg_checksum: add test for coverage
Date
Msg-id Y0ZSXY/bR9t5NPmC@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_checksum: add test for coverage  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 01:46:25PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> As written these tests aren't providing more coverage, they run more code but
> they don't ensure that the produced output is correct.  If you write these
> tests with validation on the output they will be a lot more interesting.

DongWook, if you are able to reply back to this feedback, please feel
free to send a new patch.  For now, I have marked this CF entry as
returned with feedback.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for grabbing multiple consecutive values with nextval()